Skip to content

Fix transition prescription consistency - #190

Merged
bigboateng merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/transition-law-consistency
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

Fix transition prescription consistency#190
bigboateng merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/transition-law-consistency

Conversation

@bigboateng

@bigboateng bigboateng commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • validate complete transition context with one applicability law before reporting PRESCRIBED
  • run side-effect-free effect preparation before prescription so deterministic apply refusals cannot appear late
  • return CANDIDATE while required parameters are unbound, then require targeted re-resolution
  • repair retained-goal, disabled-host, unstaged-recovery, and volatile-provider selection paths
  • regenerate checked architecture projections and update generated host contracts

Verification

  • python3 .github/scripts/release_notes.py validate
  • python3 -m unittest discover -s .github/tests -p 'test_*.py'
  • python3 .github/scripts/run_go_tests.py --jobs 10
  • cd boatstack && go test -race ./...
  • cd boatstack && go vet ./...
  • cd boatstack && go build ./...
  • git diff --check

@bigboateng
bigboateng merged commit cedaf56 into main Aug 11, 2026
15 checks passed
@bigboateng
bigboateng deleted the fix/transition-law-consistency branch August 11, 2026 16:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant